Header Ads

'Seeking asylum is a legal right': Democratic Presidential candidate Cory Booker causes controversy by helping immigrants in Mexico return to the US after they were deported as he is slammed for 'breaking the law'

Democratic Presidential candidate Cory Booker has caused controversy by crossing into Mexico to escort deported asylum seekers back over the border.
The Senator, 50, visited the Mexican border city Ciudad Juarez from El Paso, Texas, to help five women who had previously been sent back to Mexico.
He was joined by immigration rights attorneys and advocates to get the women, who are fleeing domestic violence, admitted back into the US.
However, he has been accused of breaking the law by critics who claimed he violated legislation which prohibits 'bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens into the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry'. 
His trip across the border comes after Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez  visited a detention center this week and said that illegal immigrants and asylum-seekers were 'drinking out of toilets' – a claim an agency official quickly denied. 




Several Democratic leadership candidates have made visits to detention centers in recent weeks, including Bernie Sanders, Julian Castro, Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke Kirsten Gillibrand, Pete Buttigieg, and former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper.  
Booker tweeted about his visit to Mexico, with photos and video of him escorting the immigrants shared on social media. 

He said: 'Today I crossed the US-Mexico border in El Paso with @fams2gether and @LasAmericasIAC to help five women present themselves for asylum.
'We helped the women present themselves for asylum. @LasAmericasIAC will monitor them throughout the process to ensure they aren't sent back. 



HAPPENING NOW: @SenBooker escorts victims of abuse seeking asylum across the Santa Fe bridge from Juárez, Mexico to El Paso, TX. The asylum seekers were sent back to Mexico under the MPP program. They have asked for their identities to be protected. @CoryBooker

1,398 people are talking about this

'But it shouldn't take a member of Congress to help people cross into our country. Seeking asylum is a legal right.'   
Booker said the women had been abused and lived in squalid conditions with inadequate food, water and medical attention while detained in the US.

He was slammed online for escorting the asylum seekers over the border. 
One person wrote: 'You should be charged with treason. Certainly won't get my vote.'
Another said: 'So a sitting US Senator openly admits to breaking the law. I would say kiss your prospects goodbye but your poll numbers already show that.'
A third added: 'When is the last time you went to a soup kitchen here in the US?'
Linda Rivas, an attorney with the Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, said that the women Booker helped were victims of sexual assault and labor trafficking in Juarez.
They appeared to have been sent back to Mexico under the Trump administration's 'Migrant Protection Protocols'.
MPP sends asylum-seekers back to Mexico while their applications for asylum are pending. 
It comes after Booker released a new immigration plan on Tuesday that would 'virtually eliminate immigration detention.'
If the New Jersey Senator was elected, he vowed to severely limit the time unaccompanied children are able to be held in custody. It would also put an end to for-profit detention facilities.
The 2020 Democrat contender's campaign said the plan would phase out government contracts with private prison operators over the course of three years, shut down facilities that do not meet high standards of care and reform the bond system in immigration court by prioritizing liberty over detention for immigrants.
Instead of detaining the illegal border-crossers, Booker's plan proposes they be monitored using 'alternatives to detention,' like some of the methods already being utilized by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
ICE uses ankle bracelets, bonds and in-person and phone check-ins.
There are, however, exceptions, and immigrants who pose a risk to public safety or are deemed a flight risk would still be detained as part of Booker's plan.
Booker, 50, is one of the 25 Democrats seeking the party's nomination to take on Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election.
The issue of immigration and detention centers has been high on the political agenda in recent weeks. 
Speaking outside a Border Patrol station in Clint, Texas, firebrand Congresswoman AOC raged this week: 'There's abuse in these facilities.'
'This was them knowing a congressional visit was coming. This was CBP on their best behavior. Telling people to drink out of the toilet.'
AOC said she 'forced' herself into a cell with detainees and one woman told her officers were waging 'psychological warfare' and that the agents often called them 'wh***s.'
The 29-year-old congresswoman claimed officers laughed at migrants drinking out of toilets.
The inflammatory statements – including the suggestion that she witnessed toilet-drinking herself – came hours after a news story established the existence of a private Facebook group where current and former CBP agents distributed lewd illustrations of the Democratic congresswoman from New York.
She was later criticized by members of the Jewish community after doubling down on her description of migrant detention facilities as concentration camps. 
Writer and Israel activist Emily Schrader tweeted: 'If you can’t make your point without diminishing the memory of the Holocaust you need to re-examine your claim.'
Joel M. Petlin, who contributes to the Jewish publication The Forward, tweeted in reply to AOC:
As you quadruple down on the Holocaust references, please know that actual survivors of Nazi Concentration Camps are begging you to stop & instead tour a real one in Poland. I respect your passion to help those at the border but why are you not respecting Holocaust survivors?'
In reply to Petlin, user @MicheleSabra, who calls herself a 'proud Israeli American doing my part to stop antisemitism,' tweeted: 'Because she doesn’t care about either one. Its all one big AOC show.'
Focus on detention centers increased last week after a desperate father, and his 23-month-old daughter, drowned when attempting to swim across the Rio Grande to gain illegal entry into the US.
Trump has made clamping down on illegal immigration the centerpiece of his domestic policy agenda, rallying against Central American migrants crossing into the U.S. from Mexico.
Some, including a handful of candidates, blame the current administration’s policies and crack downs for the two Salvadoran deaths, claiming they were desperate to step foot in the US.
But U.S. agencies have struggled to keep up with a surge of Central American families arriving at the border, straining resources and severely overcrowding facilities.

7 comments:

  1. I am actually speechless. Comrade Booker's Virtue Signalling has reached new levels of insanity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

  3. For you idiot Trumper’s assuming that you can read, try this, it’s the law!

    The Refugee Act established two paths to obtain refugee status—either from abroad as a resettled refugee

    Foor in the United States as an asylum seeker.

    Asylum seekers are protected by the The United Nations 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol.

    An asylee—or a person granted asylum—is protected from being returned to his or her home country, is authorized to work in the United States, may apply for a Social Security card, may request permission to travel overseas, and can petition to bring family members to the United States. Asylees may also be eligible certain benefits, such as Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance.

    After one year, an asylee may apply for lawful permanent resident status (i.e., a green card). Once the individual becomes a permanent resident, he or she must wait four years to apply for citizenship.

    These Asylum seekers have protection under our federal laws and they have every right to apply at a legal port of entry and request asylum. For your information the US is a party to the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol covering Asylum Seekers. As a signatory to the 1967 Protocol, and through U.S. immigration law, the United States has legal obligations to provide protection to those who qualify as refugees. The Refugee Act established two paths to obtain refugee status—either from abroad as a resettled refugee or in the United States as an asylum seeker.

    https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/asylum-united-states?fbclid=IwAR1d483PmkrgkcewIEJkbKbL9bfS36f4JW7rhami9Uajl-C40yUcllQD7vc

    ReplyDelete
  4. Actually, he is correct. HOWEVER, the method by which it is done is NOT open to interpretation, and is NOT guaranteed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He should be arrested. If Joe six pack did this Joe would certainly be arrested.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It seems the Refugee Act needs to be changed---those who have entered the country applying for asylum need to FOLLOW THROUGH with the process and show up in court. If they just enter the country and than stay they are illegal and should be denied any of the hand-outs the government gives to applicants.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Owners should keep a post on the property routinely. The purpose behind the law of unfavorable belonging to be in presence is that, the administration needs the proprietors to take care of their territory or property and to keep it being used. injury attorney pittsburgh

    ReplyDelete