China's secret deal with WHO to hide origins of Covid: Report claims World Health officials missed chance to stop pandemic after 'aggressive' influence campaign by Beijing led to questions about lab leak theory being dropped
The Chinese government used an 'aggressive' influence campaign on the World Health Organisation's response to the initial Covid outbreak which led to it missing its chance to stop the pandemic, it has been claimed.
An investigation by The Sunday Times has revealed efforts by Beijing to control decision making, sabotage investigations and even install officials.
Its report claims that the health body's independence had been eroded prior to the global spread of the deadly virus in early 2020.
The publication claims the WHO failed to publicly challenge Chinese misinformation, delayed declaring an international emergency, and discouraged governments from placing travel bans on China to protect its economy.
It has also been suggested officials agreed a 'backroom deal' with the Chinese to water down the inquiry into the origins of Covid-19.

An investigation has claimed that China used 'aggressive' influence on the World Health Organisation to control decision making, sabotage investigations and even install preferred officials in the run up to the coronavirus pandemic
This meant steering scientists away from the theory the coronavirus actually escaped from a Wuhan laboratory, rather than coming from rare animals in a wet market in the city in December 2019.
The theory was initially dismissed as 'extremely unlikely' but now says there might have been 'human error' at the lab. Pressure is coming from the US to look into the potential cause.
Covid-19 has since spread around the globe, and to date has killed over 4.3million people, 130,894 of them in the UK.
Central to the paper's claims is that close ties between WHO's leadership and China had impacted on its ability to challenge the country over the emergence of the virus.

Central to the paper's claims is that close ties between WHO's leadership and China had impacted on its ability to challenge the country over the emergence of the virus. Here, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the WHO shakes hands with Chinese President Xi
It is suggested China has for some time been using financial leverage over poorer nations to install its preferred figures into key roles at the WHO as well as other UN-governed bodies.
Chief among the decision makers at the WHO is director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who is a long-time friend of China. He visited Chinese President Xi Jinping in January 2020, two months before the pandemic began.
The former Ethiopian foreign minister is said to have used his role to make further appointments that were preferable to China, including making Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe a goodwill ambassador.

Covid-19 has since spread around the globe, and to date has killed over 4.3million people, 130,894 of them in the UK (stock photo)

While China has tried to insist the virus originated elsewhere, academics, politicians and the media have begun to contemplate the possibility it leaked from a high-level biochemical lab in Wuhan - raising suspicions that Chinese officials simply hid evidence of the early spread
Between 2000 and 2012 there were around 130 official Chinese finance projects in Zimbabwe, with some totalling hundreds of million of pounds to build hydroelectric dams and provide agricultural machinery.
In June last year, Zimbabwe was one of 53 countries to back the Hong Kong national security law at the United Nations, derided by Western nations as a clampdown on protestors and free speech.
Professor Richard Ebright, a fellow of America's Infectious Disease Society, told the Times that China's efforts had a 'decisive role' in affecting the agency's failure to act.
'There was no scientific or medical or policy justification for the stance that the WHO took in January and February of 2020. That was entirely premised on maintaining satisfactory ties to the Chinese government,' he said.
'Through that process, the WHO actively resisted and obstructed efforts by other nations to implement effective border controls that could have limited the spread, or even contained the spread of the outbreak.'
The support for Tedros especially had a 'remarkably high return on the investment' compared to the funds and influence used on helping him get elected.
A spokesperson for the organisation hit back at the claims, saying: 'WHO's top priority is ending the acute stage of the Covid-19 pandemic.'
Post a Comment